To that end, we advise that where it is assessed that access to the information by the Russian state would be a risk to national security, a Russia-based AV company should not be chosen. “In drawing this guidance to your attention today, it is our aim to enable departments to make informed, risk-based decisions on your choice of AV provider. In December 2017, the Lithuanian government also announced that it was going to ban the use of Kaspersky Lab’s products from computers used in critical infrastructure. The Dutch government announced that it has planned to phase out the use of Kaspersky anti-virus software as a precautionary measure, and it recommended that companies involved in the protection of critical infrastructure did the same. This was reinforced in mid-December when President Donald Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act for FY2018. The US General Services Administration removed Kaspersky Labs from the list of approved vendors, and the US firm Best Buy removed Kaspersky Lab products from its shelves. national security.”ĭHS Statement on the Issuance of Binding Operational Directive 17-01, September 2017, The risk that the Russian government, whether acting on its own or in collaboration with Kaspersky, could capitalize on access provided by Kaspersky products to compromise federal information and information systems directly implicates U.S. The Department is concerned about the ties between certain Kaspersky officials and Russian intelligence and other government agencies, and requirements under Russian law that allow Russian intelligence agencies to request or compel assistance from Kaspersky and to intercept communications transiting Russian networks. Kaspersky anti-virus products and solutions provide broad access to files and elevated privileges on the computers on which the software is installed, which can be exploited by malicious cyber actors to compromise those information systems. “This action is based on the information security risks presented by the use of Kaspersky products on federal information systems. They stated suspected links to Russian intelligence services and made reference to Russian law requiring communications companies to assist Russian intelligence in intercepting communications transiting Russian networks. In July 2017, there was a proposed bill in the US to prohibit the use of Kaspersky Labs software, and in September The United States Department of Homeland Security ordered US agencies to replace Kaspersky software with other approved software by the end of November 2017. (See Kaspersky’s responses below) Ban on Kaspersky USA The New Your Times has gone on to make additional claims against Kaspersky, all of which have been rebuked by the company. However, the report contained no evidence and only cited anonymous sources, hardly conclusive or verifiable, indeed Kaspersky posted a reply on September 6th identifying the lack of any evidence. The hackers appear to have targeted the contractor after identifying the files through the contractor’s use of a popular antivirus software made by Russia-based Kaspersky Lab” penetrates foreign computer networks and defends against cyberattacks after a National Security Agency contractor removed the highly classified material and put it on his home computer, according to multiple people with knowledge of the matter. “Hackers working for the Russian government stole details of how the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |